top of page
ChatGPT Image May 22, 2025, 02_53_38 PM.png

Expanding Market Access

ICAN is aggressively challenging the SEC's paternalistic restrictions that lock everyday Americans out of wealth-building opportunities, while stifling economic growth and innovation.

 

While often dismissed as simply a "Wall Street problem," the SEC’s ever-expanding labyrinth of regulations often hit Main Street hardest, with the agency’s reach extending all the way down to the local food truck owner seeking to raise funds to expand his enterprise and to the long-time mom and pop store owners who, after a lifetime of work, want to put their hard-earned money to work by investing in their own community. In order to “protect” small entrepreneurs and investors, the federal government limits who can invest in private enterprise and severely restricts how small entrepreneurs can raise the capital needed to launch or expand new efforts.

 

Our litigation and advocacy efforts focus on modernizing crowdfunding regulations, reforming arbitrary wealth-based rules, and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens for small businesses seeking capital.

Our Work

Litigation

Emily Kapszukiewicz & Healthcare Shares, P.B.C. v SEC

What does it say about our system when someone trusted to run a healthcare company is told she can’t invest in one? Emily, a seasoned leader with nearly a million in savings, was barred from backing a healthcare fund aligned with her own expertise because of the accredited investor rule. This rule strips away the basic right to pursue economic opportunity—a right at the heart of the American promise. Instead of empowering skilled, mission-driven people like Emily, the SEC’s wealth and income test reserves the best opportunities for the wealthy few. ICAN is stepping in to fight back.

ICAN v SEC: Challenging Inaction on Accredited Investor Reform

ICAN has challenged the SEC's outdated "accredited investor" rule that arbitrarily prevents 80% of Americans from accessing private investment opportunities based solely on wealth thresholds rather than knowledge or experience, fighting to democratize access to wealth-building opportunities for all Americans.

PulseChain- SEC v Schueler

In an unprecedented expansion of its enforcement approach, the SEC named three software programs—a blockchain token, a blockchain network, and a protocol—as defendants, prompting ICAN to file an amicus brief that successfully challenged the agency's attempt to wage war against software and secured a significant victory for the PulseChain community.

SEC v Punch TV

Joseph Collins, a Los Angeles entrepreneur, faced a ruinous $1.35 million SEC demand over a self-reported technical violation with no fraud or investor harm, until ICAN secured a complete victory rejecting the SEC's disgorgement attempt and preserving key limits on the agency's powers.

Amicus Briefs & Comment Letters

Custodia Bank v Federal Reserve Board (10th Cir. Dec 22, 2025)

Curbing administrative overreach by ensuring that government transparency mandates are not reinterpreted as broad grants of unreviewable authority to bypass state regulatory frameworks

SEC v Binance, 23-cv-10599 (D.D.C., September 28, 2023)

Challenging the SEC's attempt to restrict investors' access to digital asset trading platforms located outside the United States.

Custodia Bank v Federal Reserve Board of Governors, No. 24-8024 (10th Circuit, July 2, 2024)

Opposing misinterpretation of statutory provision as recognizing or bolstering the discretion to reject master account applications from statutorily eligible depository institutions.

Corpus Christi Firefighters’ Retirement System v. Macellum Capital Management LP, et al.

Opposing misuse of greenmail statute to punish non-manipulative, unharmful activist shareholder conduct.

In re Coinbase, No. 23-1779 (3rd Cir., May 10, 2023)

Supporting petition for writ of mandate requiring SEC to respond to rule-making request.

SEC v Payward, Inc. (Kraken), No. 23-cv-06003 (N.D. Cal., February 28, 2024)

Supporting motion to dismiss complaint that would extend SEC jurisdiction over digital asset trading platforms based on a novel theory that "investment contract" securities do not require contracts.

Lejilex v SEC, No. 4:24-cv-00168 (N.D. Tx, July 10, 2024)

Supporting litigation to establish limits to SEC jurisdiction over digital assets.

Beba LLC and DeFi Education Fund v SEC, No. 24-cv-00153 (W.D. Tx, October 28, 2024)

Supporting claims for more transparent regulation of digital assets.

Advocacy

Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN Law) is a nonprofit public interest litigation organization dedicated to breaking down barriers to entry to capital markets and pushing back against the overreach of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Email: info@icanlaw.org

Investors Choice Advocates Network is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization.

All contributions are tax deductible.

No goods or services will be provided in exchange for this contribution.

EIN: 87-3986761

Terms, Conditions and Privacy Policy State Disclosures

Contact Us

453 S Spring St Ste 400
Los Angeles, CA 90013

bottom of page